Prior to a very skeptically-approached Thin Lizzy show a few weeks back, I would have never considered giving Live in London 2011 a chance. After being blown away by the raging remnants of the almighty band, though, I quickly placed an order for this double-album, hoping that this lightning was indeed captured in a bottle from an outing that featured the always-excellent Vivian Campbell to boot. So, how was it? The quick version: ...ergh. The long version: just keep reading.
But guitars are what really matter here, right? So why, then, do they sound so uninspired and by-the-numbers? Across a generous twenty tracks, many of the the requisite big hits, the majority feel like a tribute band playing it safe. Neither Gorham nor Campbell take any chances and, while I could never dream of ably playing these Lizzy tunes, I've heard cover bands handle the hits just as well. A few later-era numbers, particularly a couple from Renegade, actually come across pretty successfully. And fewer still, specifically "Emerald" and "Black Rose," absolutely shine (one must wonder if this Gorham-era lineup doesn't find more success in a distilled opener's set like that on the Epitaph tour). I know I am supposed to bow at the altar of the lifer, Brian Downey, and while I certainly do not hold him in low regard, Lizzy drums were always the aspect of the band to which I paid the least attention. Even highlighted by his showcase, "Sha La La La," I cannot say time has done anything to change my opinions of Thin Lizzy percussion.
Finally, production - or lack thereof - on Live in London 2011 blows. Now, if the album succeeded I would hypocritically say it was "raw" and praise it as such - but you cannot have a great live record without a great live performance and some clean-up and editing would be welcome here. Being instead a ho-hum show from a single date (January 23rd), this "instant recording" (indeed announced on record as available immediately after the show) sounds like one, i.e., a pretty good bootleg. Granted, the notoriously tinkered Live & Dangerous would not be a fair comparison by any means but I did pull out the supposedly unaltered Still Dangerous as a reference for that undefinable energy. Still Dangerous wins, hands down. It sounds sloppy. Phil flubs lines. And it's glorious. Not a classic record by any means but, based on what I hear, it sounds like a show I would have wanted to attend. There's a slinky magic that, despite everyone's best efforts, eludes a Lynott-less Lizzy. They can get close, I witnessed that much, but Live in London 2011 is nowhere near.
No comments:
Post a Comment